DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Holden Commodore vs 2004 Pontiac GTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac GTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakePontiac
CommodoreModelGTO
2006Model year2004
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,0 s
0 km/hTop speed257 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
320 HPPower344 HP
464 NmTorque488 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/40 R18Tyre size235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4891 mmLength4800 mm
1842 mmWidth1840 mm
1425 mmHeight1400 mm
1615 KgWeight1650 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Holden Commodore and 2004 Pontiac GTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac GTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…