DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Holden Commodore vs 2004 Cadillac Escalade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

81.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeCadillac
CommodoreModelEscalade
2006Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
234 km/hTop speed174 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
340 HPPower349 HP
470 NmTorque515 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank98 lt
13 ltUrban consumption19,6 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt
—Average consumption16,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
235/45 R17Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength5052 mm
1842 mmWidth2004 mm
1450 mmHeight1885 mm
1640 KgWeight2635 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Holden Commodore and 2004 Cadillac Escalade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…