DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Suburban vs 2006 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Suburban

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeHolden
SuburbanModelCommodore
2004Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
9Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,9 s
156 km/hTop speed234 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
340 HPPower340 HP
508 NmTorque470 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
146 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
245/75 R16Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5570 mmLength4884 mm
2002 mmWidth1842 mm
1887 mmHeight1450 mm
2595 KgWeight1640 Kg
3302 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Suburban and 2006 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Suburban leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…