DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Commodore vs 1999 Lincoln Navigator Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeLincoln
CommodoreModelNavigator
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h—
234 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5408 cc
306 HPPower300 HP
460 NmTorque481 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank114 lt
13 ltUrban consumption19,6 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt
—Average consumption18,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size275/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4964 mmLength5202 mm
1842 mmWidth2030 mm
1450 mmHeight1948 mm
1640 KgWeight2532 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase3023 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Commodore and 1999 Lincoln Navigator approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…