DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Holden Commodore vs 2000 Holden Calais Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Calais

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.75–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
CommodoreModelCalais
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
243 HPPower243 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank73 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4885 mmLength4885 mm
1840 mmWidth1840 mm
1450 mmHeight1450 mm
1600 KgWeight1630 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Holden Commodore and 2000 Holden Calais approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Calais leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…