DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Commodore vs 1999 Pontiac Firebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakePontiac
CommodoreModelFirebird
2000Model year1999
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
207 HPPower208 HP
305 NmTorque312 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank59 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R16 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5084 mmLength4968 mm
1847 mmWidth1893 mm
1545 mmHeight1321 mm
1635 KgWeight1468 Kg
2938 mmWheelbase2566 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Commodore and 1999 Pontiac Firebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…