DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Pontiac Firebird vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PontiacMakeHolden
FirebirdModelCommodore
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
208 HPPower207 HP
312 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16 STyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4968 mmLength5084 mm
1893 mmWidth1847 mm
1321 mmHeight1545 mm
1468 KgWeight1635 Kg
2566 mmWheelbase2938 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Pontiac Firebird and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…