DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Commodore vs 1999 Holden Statesman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
CommodoreModelStatesman
2000Model year1999
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
207 HPPower207 HP
305 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
11 ltUrban consumption12 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5084 mmLength5237 mm
1847 mmWidth1847 mm
1545 mmHeight1459 mm
1635 KgWeight1680 Kg
2938 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Commodore and 1999 Holden Statesman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…