DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Holden Commodore vs 1997 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.75–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
CommodoreModelCommodore
1998Model year1997
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3813 cc
200 HPPower177 HP
304 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank63 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength4861 mm
1842 mmWidth1794 mm
1450 mmHeight1448 mm
1550 KgWeight1370 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Holden Commodore and 1997 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…