DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Holden Calais vs 1998 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Calais

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–63.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
CalaisModelCommodore
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
175 HPPower200 HP
295 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
12,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15 HTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4884 mm
1794 mmWidth1842 mm
1443 mmHeight1450 mm
1454 KgWeight1550 Kg
2736 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Holden Calais and 1998 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Calais leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…