DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Holden Commodore vs 1998 Chevrolet Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.75–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChevrolet
CommodoreModelOmega
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement4093 cc
200 HPPower168 HP
304 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength4738 mm
1842 mmWidth1760 mm
1450 mmHeight1418 mm
1550 KgWeight1505 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Holden Commodore and 1998 Chevrolet Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…