2006 • Holden
Caprice
Holden Caprice 3.8 i V6 SC (233 Hp) 2006Overall Score73.75/100
2006 Holden Caprice vs 2006 Toyota Blade Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 3.4 24V6 (280 Hp) 2006Overall Score74.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Blade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
73.75–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CapriceSpecificationToyota Blade
HoldenMakeToyota
CapriceModelBlade
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Holden CapriceSpecificationToyota Blade
—0–100 km/h6,6 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
233 HPPower280 HP
375 NmTorque206 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Holden CapriceSpecificationToyota Blade
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/55 R16VTyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden CapriceSpecificationToyota Blade
5237 mmLength4220 mm
1847 mmWidth1760 mm
1459 mmHeight1515 mm
1722 KgWeight1250 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Holden Caprice and 2006 Toyota Blade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…