2006 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 3.4 24V6 (280 Hp) 2006Overall Score74.25/100
2006 Toyota Blade vs 2006 Holden Caprice Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Holden
Caprice
Holden Caprice 3.8 i V6 SC (233 Hp) 2006Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Blade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
74.25–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota BladeSpecificationHolden Caprice
ToyotaMakeHolden
BladeModelCaprice
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota BladeSpecificationHolden Caprice
6,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
280 HPPower233 HP
206 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota BladeSpecificationHolden Caprice
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size225/55 R16V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota BladeSpecificationHolden Caprice
4220 mmLength5237 mm
1760 mmWidth1847 mm
1515 mmHeight1459 mm
1250 KgWeight1722 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2939 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Toyota Blade and 2006 Holden Caprice approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…