DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Calais vs 1999 Lincoln Mark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Calais

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.75–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeLincoln
CalaisModelMark
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,1 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement5398 cc
243 HPPower232 HP
400 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4885 mmLength5265 mm
1840 mmWidth1900 mm
1450 mmHeight1360 mm
1630 KgWeight1730 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Calais and 1999 Lincoln Mark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Calais leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…