DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Great Wall SUV vs 2006 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeRenault
SUVModelScenic
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,6 s
140 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
105 HPPower100 HP
190 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4259 mm
1725 mmWidth1810 mm
1820 mmHeight1620 mm
1760 KgWeight—
2615 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Great Wall SUV and 2006 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…