DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Renault Scenic vs 2006 Great Wall SUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeGreat Wall
ScenicModelSUV
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
192 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
200 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,0 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—

Dimensions

4259 mmLength4860 mm
1810 mmWidth1725 mm
1620 mmHeight1820 mm
—Weight1760 Kg
2685 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Renault Scenic and 2006 Great Wall SUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…