2004 • Great Wall
SUV
Great Wall SUV 2.2 i (105 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
2004 Great Wall SUV vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • MG
ZS
MG ZS 2.0 TDi (113 Hp) 2004Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
MG ZS
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Great Wall SUVSpecificationMG ZS
Great WallMakeMG
SUVModelZS
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Great Wall SUVSpecificationMG ZS
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
140 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
105 HPPower113 HP
190 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Great Wall SUVSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Great Wall SUVSpecificationMG ZS
4860 mmLength4520 mm
1725 mmWidth1700 mm
1820 mmHeight1390 mm
1760 KgWeight1225 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Great Wall SUV and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableRover 25 vs Great Wall SUV2004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMG ZR vs Great Wall SUV2004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMG ZS vs Great Wall SUV2004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableRover 45 vs Great Wall SUV2004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableHyundai H-1 vs Great Wall SUV2004 and 2004 model yearsComments are loading…