DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Great Wall SUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationGreat Wall SUV
MGMakeGreat Wall
ZSModelSUV
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationGreat Wall SUV
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
113 HPPower105 HP
260 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationGreat Wall SUV
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationGreat Wall SUV
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationGreat Wall SUV
4520 mmLength4860 mm
1700 mmWidth1725 mm
1390 mmHeight1820 mm
1225 KgWeight1760 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Great Wall SUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…