DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Great Wall SUV vs 2004 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great Wall SUVSpecificationMG ZR
Great WallMakeMG
SUVModelZR
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Great Wall SUVSpecificationMG ZR
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
140 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
105 HPPower113 HP
190 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Great Wall SUVSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Great Wall SUVSpecificationMG ZR
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Great Wall SUVSpecificationMG ZR
4860 mmLength4011 mm
1725 mmWidth1690 mm
1820 mmHeight1400 mm
1760 KgWeight1155 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Great Wall SUV and 2004 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…