DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Great Wall Steed vs 2014 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeFord
SteedModelRanger
2017Model year2014
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
160 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2378 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
122 HPPower125 HP
200 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption8,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
12,4 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
235/70 R16Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5345 mmLength5359 mm
1800 mmWidth1850 mm
1760 mmHeight1815 mm
—Weight2048 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Great Wall Steed and 2014 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…