2014 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (125 Hp) 2014Overall Score62.5/100
2014 Ford Ranger vs 2017 Great Wall Steed Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Great Wall
Steed
Great Wall Steed 2.4i (122 Hp) 2017Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
FordMakeGreat Wall
RangerModelSteed
2014Model year2017
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
14,9 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
175 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2378 cc
125 HPPower122 HP
320 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,6 ltAverage consumption12,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
5359 mmLength5345 mm
1850 mmWidth1800 mm
1815 mmHeight1760 mm
2048 KgWeight—
3220 mmWheelbase3200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Ford Ranger and 2017 Great Wall Steed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…