DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Great Wall Steed vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMazda
SteedModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
160 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
139 HPPower160 HP
305 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption8,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5040 mmLength4555 mm
1800 mmWidth1840 mm
1730 mmHeight1710 mm
—Weight1488 Kg
3050 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Great Wall Steed and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…