DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Great Wall Steed vs 2010 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeSubaru
SteedModelForester
2011Model year2010
Pick-upBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
160 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
139 HPPower150 HP
305 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5040 mmLength4485 mm
1800 mmWidth1735 mm
1730 mmHeight1590 mm
—Weight1390 Kg
3050 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Great Wall Steed and 2010 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…