DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Great Wall Safe vs 2009 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeFord
SafeModelGalaxy
2009Model year2009
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,6 s
140 km/hTop speed191 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
105 HPPower161 HP
190 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/75 R15Tyre size215/60R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4820 mm
—Width1854 mm
1820 mmHeight1723 mm
1640 KgWeight1625 Kg
—Wheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Great Wall Safe and 2009 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…