2009 • Ford
Galaxy
Ford Galaxy 2.3 i 16V (161 Hp) 2009Overall Score63.25/100
2009 Ford Galaxy vs 2009 Great Wall Safe Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Great Wall
Safe
Great Wall Safe 2.2i (105 Hp) 2009Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Galaxy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford GalaxySpecificationGreat Wall Safe
FordMakeGreat Wall
GalaxyModelSafe
2009Model year2009
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford GalaxySpecificationGreat Wall Safe
11,6 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
161 HPPower105 HP
208 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford GalaxySpecificationGreat Wall Safe
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford GalaxySpecificationGreat Wall Safe
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/60R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford GalaxySpecificationGreat Wall Safe
4820 mmLength4860 mm
1854 mmWidth—
1723 mmHeight1820 mm
1625 KgWeight1640 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Ford Galaxy and 2009 Great Wall Safe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…