DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Great Wall Safe vs 2008 SsangYong Chairman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeSsangYong
SafeModelChairman
2008Model year2008
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,6 s
140 km/hTop speed197 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
105 HPPower150 HP
190 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption15,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength5055 mm
—Width1825 mm
1820 mmHeight1465 mm
1640 KgWeight1700 Kg
—Wheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Great Wall Safe and 2008 SsangYong Chairman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…