DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 SsangYong Chairman vs 2008 Great Wall Safe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeGreat Wall
ChairmanModelSafe
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
150 HPPower105 HP
220 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption—
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

5055 mmLength4860 mm
1825 mmWidth—
1465 mmHeight1820 mm
1700 KgWeight1640 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 SsangYong Chairman and 2008 Great Wall Safe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…