DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Great Wall RUV vs 2007 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeFord
RUVModelMaverick
2007Model year2007
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5-7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed171 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
105 HPPower150 HP
190 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption13,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5105 mmLength4441 mm
1785 mmWidth1825 mm
1870 mmHeight1762 mm
1670 KgWeight1530 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Great Wall RUV and 2007 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…