DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda Tribute vs 2007 Great Wall RUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeGreat Wall
TributeModelRUV
2007Model year2007
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5-7
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h—
171 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
150 HPPower105 HP
200 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R16 99 STyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength5105 mm
1800 mmWidth1785 mm
1710 mmHeight1870 mm
1455 KgWeight1670 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda Tribute and 2007 Great Wall RUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…