DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Great Wall Hover H6 vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMazda
Hover H6ModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
180 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
143 HPPower160 HP
310 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption8,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4555 mm
1825 mmWidth1840 mm
1745 mmHeight1710 mm
—Weight1488 Kg
2680 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Great Wall Hover H6 and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…