DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 SsangYong Chairman vs 2012 Great Wall Hover H6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeGreat Wall
ChairmanModelHover H6
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
197 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
220 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank58 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption—
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5055 mmLength4640 mm
1825 mmWidth1825 mm
1465 mmHeight1745 mm
1700 KgWeight—
2900 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 SsangYong Chairman and 2012 Great Wall Hover H6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…