DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Great Wall Hover CUV vs 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMitsubishi
Hover CUVModelPajero
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h18,0 s
170 km/hTop speed151 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
130 HPPower133 HP
192 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank74 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,8 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4610 mm
1800 mmWidth1775 mm
1775 mmHeight1735 mm
1830 KgWeight1830 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Great Wall Hover CUV and 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…