DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Chrysler Voyager vs 2006 Great Wall Hover CUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeGreat Wall
VoyagerModelHover CUV
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,8 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
183 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2429 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
147 HPPower130 HP
218 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank74 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption14 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,1 ltAverage consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4620 mm
1995 mmWidth1800 mm
1750 mmHeight1775 mm
1750 KgWeight1830 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Chrysler Voyager and 2006 Great Wall Hover CUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…