DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Great Wall Hover CUV vs 2006 Chrysler Voyager Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeChrysler
Hover CUVModelVoyager
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
170 km/hTop speed183 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2429 cc
130 HPPower147 HP
192 NmTorque218 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank75 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
10 ltAverage consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4805 mm
1800 mmWidth1995 mm
1775 mmHeight1750 mm
1830 KgWeight1750 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Great Wall Hover CUV and 2006 Chrysler Voyager approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…