DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Great Wall Cowry vs 2012 Toyota Wish Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeToyota
CowryModelWish
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeMinivan
8Seats6/7
4Doors5

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1986 cc
143 HPPower158 HP
185 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5GearsCVT-i
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size215/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4590 mm
1704 mmWidth1695-1745 mm
1845 mmHeight1590-1600 mm
1510 KgWeight1380-1420 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Great Wall Cowry and 2012 Toyota Wish approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…