DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Great Wall Cowry vs 2012 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeFord
CowryModelRanger
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typePick-up
8Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,3 s
170 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
185 NmTorque375 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption10,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,7 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength5359 mm
1704 mmWidth1850 mm
1845 mmHeight1815 mm
1510 KgWeight2048 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Great Wall Cowry and 2012 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…