DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Great Wall Cowry vs 2010 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeRenault
CowryModelTrafic
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeMinivan
8Seats9
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,7 s
170 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2464 cc
143 HPPower145 HP
185 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank90 lt
—Urban consumption10,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4782 mm
1704 mmWidth1904 mm
1845 mmHeight1955 mm
1510 KgWeight1710 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Great Wall Cowry and 2010 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…