DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Skoda Yeti vs 2010 Great Wall Cowry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeGreat Wall
YetiModelCowry
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
140 HPPower143 HP
320 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/60 R16; 225/50 R17Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4223 mmLength4574 mm
1793 mmWidth1704 mm
1691 mmHeight1845 mm
1545 KgWeight1510 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Skoda Yeti and 2010 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…