DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Great Wall Cowry vs 2010 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeKia
CowryModelOptima
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
170 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower165 HP
185 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4800 mm
1704 mmWidth1805 mm
1845 mmHeight1480 mm
1510 KgWeight1418 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Great Wall Cowry and 2010 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…