DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Great Wall Cowry vs 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeChrysler
CowryModelPT Cruiser
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeEstate
8Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,3 s
170 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2148 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
185 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4288 mm
1704 mmWidth1748 mm
1845 mmHeight1665 mm
1510 KgWeight1515 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2616 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Great Wall Cowry and 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…