DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Great Wall Cool Bear vs 2011 Mini Clubman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cool Bear

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMini
Cool BearModelClubman
2011Model year2011
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
160 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
105 HPPower122 HP
138 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption7,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3951 mmLength3937 mm
1695 mmWidth1683 mm
1634 mmHeight1426 mm
1260 KgWeight1145 Kg
2499 mmWheelbase2547 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Great Wall Cool Bear and 2011 Mini Clubman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cool Bear leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…