2011 • Mini
Clubman
Mini Clubman 1.6 (122 Hp) 2011Overall Score62.5/100
2011 Mini Clubman vs 2011 Great Wall Cool Bear Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Great Wall
Cool Bear
Great Wall Cool Bear Cool 2011Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Great Wall Cool Bear
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mini ClubmanSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
MiniMakeGreat Wall
ClubmanModelCool Bear
2011Model year2011
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mini ClubmanSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
201 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
122 HPPower105 HP
160 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mini ClubmanSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,5 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mini ClubmanSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/65 R15 84HTyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mini ClubmanSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
3937 mmLength3951 mm
1683 mmWidth1695 mm
1426 mmHeight1634 mm
1145 KgWeight1260 Kg
2547 mmWheelbase2499 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Mini Clubman and 2011 Great Wall Cool Bear approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Great Wall Cool Bear leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…