DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 GMC Yukon vs 2004 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeHolden
YukonModelCommodore
2005Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
9Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
156 km/hTop speed234 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
324 HPPower340 HP
502 NmTorque470 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
123 ltFuel tank75 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption13 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
245/75 R16Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5570 mmLength4884 mm
2002 mmWidth1842 mm
1923 mmHeight1450 mm
2310 KgWeight1640 Kg
3302 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 GMC Yukon and 2004 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…