DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 GMC Yukon vs 2015 Nissan Titan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeNissan
YukonModelTitan
2013Model year2015
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
9Seats5/6
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5327 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
324 HPPower390 HP
461 NmTorque394 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank98 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears7
255/70 R17Tyre size245/75 R17; 275/65 R18; 265/60 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5130 mmLength6165-6187 mm
2007 mmWidth2019-2050 mm
1956 mmHeight1981-2002 mm
2435 KgWeight2847-3033 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase3551 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 GMC Yukon and 2015 Nissan Titan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…