DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Jaguar XF vs 2013 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

81.25–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationGMC Yukon
JaguarMakeGMC
XFModelYukon
2015Model year2013
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats9
4Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationGMC Yukon
5,7 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5000 ccEngine displacement5327 cc
385 HPPower324 HP
0 NmTorque461 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationGMC Yukon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank98 lt
17,3 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationGMC Yukon
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size255/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationGMC Yukon
4961 mmLength5130 mm
1877 mmWidth2007 mm
1460 mmHeight1956 mm
1780 KgWeight2435 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Jaguar XF and 2013 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…