E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 GMC Yukon vs 2015 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

81.75–81.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMC YukonSpecificationJaguar XF
GMCMakeJaguar
YukonModelXF
2013Model year2015
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
9Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

GMC YukonSpecificationJaguar XF
—0–100 km/h5,7 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5327 ccEngine displacement5000 cc
324 HPPower385 HP
461 NmTorque0 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

GMC YukonSpecificationJaguar XF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank64 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption17,3 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GMC YukonSpecificationJaguar XF
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
255/70 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GMC YukonSpecificationJaguar XF
5130 mmLength4961 mm
2007 mmWidth1877 mm
1956 mmHeight1460 mm
2435 KgWeight1780 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 GMC Yukon and 2015 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2015 Nissan TitanVSImage unavailableNissan Titan vs GMC Yukon2015 and 2013 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableJaguar XF vs GMC Yukon2015 and 2013 model years

Comments are loading…