DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GMC Yukon vs 2003 Cadillac Escalade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeCadillac
YukonModelEscalade
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
9Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
156 km/hTop speed174 km/h
5327 ccEngine displacement5328 cc
288 HPPower288 HP
440 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
123 ltFuel tank98 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption17 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption14 lt
—Average consumption15 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5570 mmLength5052 mm
2002 mmWidth2004 mm
1923 mmHeight1885 mm
2400 KgWeight2519 Kg
3302 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GMC Yukon and 2003 Cadillac Escalade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…