DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 GMC Yukon vs 2003 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMC YukonSpecificationGMC Yukon
GMCMakeGMC
YukonModelYukon
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats9
5Doors5

Performance

GMC YukonSpecificationGMC Yukon
0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
5327 ccEngine displacement5327 cc
288 HPPower288 HP
440 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

GMC YukonSpecificationGMC Yukon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank123 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GMC YukonSpecificationGMC Yukon
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GMC YukonSpecificationGMC Yukon
5042 mmLength5570 mm
2004 mmWidth2002 mm
1948 mmHeight1923 mm
2250 KgWeight2400 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase3302 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 GMC Yukon and 2003 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…