DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GMC Yukon vs 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeJeep
YukonModelGrand Cherokee
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

156 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4807 ccEngine displacement4701 cc
278 HPPower269 HP
393 NmTorque441 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank78 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
245/75 R16Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength4610 mm
2004 mmWidth1836 mm
1948 mmHeight1786 mm
2250 KgWeight1814 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GMC Yukon and 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…