DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 2003 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeGMC
Grand CherokeeModelYukon
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4807 cc
269 HPPower278 HP
441 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/65 R17Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength5052 mm
1836 mmWidth2004 mm
1786 mmHeight1948 mm
1814 KgWeight2250 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2003 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…